Don't you know? Ask!

Info Act, known among ordinary people as "Act No. 106/1999 Coll.", it can be a significant helper in cases when obtaining information from the so-called  "mandatory subjects" suddenly becomes cloudy or very foggy. Even if it is not a panacea, it calms the human desire to know the background of everything and immediately, as a homeopathic medicine replacing potions from area of "one lady said", could be highly recommend because of our own experiences.

We used this institute for the first time almost three years ago on 12/10/2021. At that time, we only wanted to verify our suspicions, whether there could be some closer connection between Radio ГA / ГA and the District Court for Prague 10 in the "fair decision-making" of the lawsuits of its former "fired" employees. We were then close to losing the courts in both of my lawsuits, after the rejection of our objection of bias towards their same judge

JH (#Dr. Hustá"), consecrated by the superior Municipal Court of Prague in memorable turbo decision by the non-competent judicial "senate-not-senate", and so we wanted to have finally clear in the matter "who with whom" especially before further court battles. For more details on what we learned then, see here .

After 4 years of never-ending court battles, after mutual appeals against the judgments of the courts of first and second instance in fashion "we against them and they against us", after our 7 attempts at reconciliation in the sense of "already there were enough ruined dolls - let's play in another sandbox", today we moved into the next appeal to the Supreme Court in fashion of fifth year mutual "jihad". Gradually, #LA ("Leklá Andělka") began to absent from the court, and she was replaced by her younger colleague from the same fan club in the public space, and thus the only fighter defending the noble interests of Radio ГA / ГA against me in all 3 lawsuits (abbreviated as "Firing", "Discrimination" and "Muzzled") remained their loyal and US taxpayer paid attorney #MV ("Mgr. Prasátko”). A certain defect in his professionalism is the fact that since the fall of last year, this whole "theatre" he began to take, also thanks to the unaddressed posts on the local website about him, very personally.

As described in post “Reputation for 1000 American Bucks” here, with the decision of the Municipal Court of Prague which was annulled by the judgment of the court of first instance of Judge #JH ("Dr. Hustá") in the matter of my lawsuit against discrimination (according to the ATZ Act) and a new trial in this case should have taken place before another judicial panel of the local circuit court.

Our increased self-confidence and joy from the decision of the higher court soon took its toll.

The idea that the decision "in the name of the republic" of the superior court in the wording - "another court panel will decide in this matter" - will mean that we will meet with our known judge mainly in our wet dreams and thus after 3 years the court proceedings returned to the righteous hands of the "16 C" court panel. However, it is necessary to note here that in both of my lawsuits it will not (yet) be decided by #JH ("Dr. Hustá"), but it will be held by her direct representatives.

So, probably there are no people in the circuit court and the Radio ГA / ГA cases cannot be judged fairly by another one...

But let's go back in time to 2021.

On September 3, 2021, the deputy president of the District Court for Prague 10 unfortunately answered our question regarding the specialisation of her court in hearing lawsuits under the ATZ ("anti-discrimination law") this:

Since we were convinced that if there is a law in the collection of laws that has passed the legislative process of the Parliament of the Czech Republic, there should also be a specialist in the courts of first instance who professionally deals with violations of this law. We did not want to be satisfied with the (non-public) opinion of Judge #JH ("Dr. Hustá") regarding the substance of this law, which she provided to her associate of her senate the other day just before the ruling against my lawsuit:

We chiseled our lawsuit very carefully before filing it in March 2020. During its preparation, we even consulted it with an external specialist, who represents the Czech Republic in the European Parliament, and who deals with this law and publications.

Simplifying our work and assigning this type of lawsuit to the labour law bag was something that we did not want to settle for. Especially from the reason that for each of these types the burden of proof is set differently – once per defendant and once on the plaintiff's side.

In other words - if I claim that there was discrimination in labour law proceedings, the defendant must prove that this was not the case. But if I am suing the defendant party that I was wrongfully "kicked out", I, as the plaintiff, have to prove it.

But we are already getting on very fragile disgustingly professionally legal ice.

After this "unfortunate" information from the court management, the manipulation of our lawsuits in "their court" and the judge's pressure to reclassify them into another category began to take on clearer contours.

All these goods of theirs suddenly began to gnaw at them like straw from their boots.

And so the date was set for us.

The newly appointed judge of the well-known court panel "16 C" sent us the date 10/4/2023 as the date of our first court hearing in the matter of our remedial "anti-discrimination lawsuit".

We started compiling several dozen pages of documents for this meeting and mentally preparing for one of the further moves from Slovakia, where I am increasingly occurred. Actually, we haven't had the honor to sit with Mr. Judge in one courtroom yet, but a few clicks on Google told us something. And since we knew that in Prague 10 there is no specialist in this type of lawsuit, his invitation to court predicted nothing crystal clear in advance.

Or does it seem normal to you that someone, without torture, subscribes to deciding on something, in what is legally unpopular?

Suddenly we came up with an idea that we should start with the well-known process of "brain storming". And result?

After all, the court process in such a situation cannot have any solution!

Why?

Because there can only be two variants of how it all can turn out. And unfortunately none lead to our victory.

1. Variant:

The court decides in my favor and the opposing party appeals because the "court of competent jurisdiction" did not decide

2. Variant:

The court decides v against me and we appeal because the "court of competent jurisdiction" did not decide

In IT developer jargon, this is called as "looping in the program". But how to get out of it without losing the flower (and not destroying the computer with the program)?

Cui bono?

The defendant party "perhaps" does not know about this information of ours from the court management, or pretends not to know about it. If he really monitors the posts published here three times a day, as I regularly learn from the statement from the provider, he is probably already working with this information. He also knows that the case will be decided by the well-known "16 C" court panel.

Does he know that we know it's not true? Does he expect us to object to it at the outset?

Let's see what they write about this v OSŘ (Civil and Judicial Code).

„If the court, in which the proceedings were initiated, believes that it does not have substantive jurisdiction, or if it has raised such objection by a party to the proceedings, the superior or Supreme Court have to make decision. The court of appeal or the court of appeals can also decide on jurisdiction.

Knowing that we are starting to tease the judicial cobra with our bare feet, we delivered our objection to material jurisdiction to the court on the eve of the scheduled court hearing and supplemented it with opinion from answers of the deputy president of the court. We also did not forget to openly state our concerns described above to him and we expected that he would try to at least dispel them a little.  Perhaps even by declaring that he feels materially competent! And in order to be really sure that our information is really true, we addressed the following question (according to the "Info Act") to the Ministry of Justice of the Czech Republic.

---

---

Bite the nails on our hands and on those bare feet, we waited for the snake attack and at the same time hoped for satisfying information from the most anointed.

We understood them. Letting the matter jurisdiction be decided by the initiative of some "last" party to the proceedings, namely by the High Court or the Supreme Court, can be quite a challenge for the court of the first instance.

Week by week came together and on 20.12.2023 we received a pre-Christmas present from the most anointed ones. That it was the fairy-tale answer "neither undressed nor dressed" or the cinematic "I'm telling you, but you don't know it from me" was obvious. After all, we are dealing with the ministry, which did not disappoint this time either!

---

---

We've known about the existence of such a thing as "Work Schedule" for almost 4 years, so we didn't help ourselves much here. In addition, there is one thing that the Ministerial Council has kept silent about - namely, the fact that their quality and timeliness is a story in itself.

However, they advised us on one thing – ask further, ask the district courts in the Czech Republic!

Probably the plan was to give up for good now... Still.

However, it was necessary to act quickly, because the answer from the court was already on its way and we still had no more than a response from its presidency.

For those of of you who are unwelcome in this area, I state that there are total of 86 district courts, and it is necessary to reach out them quickly. 75 of of them are marked as a standard district court and the rest of 10 district courts are in Prague (Prague 1 to Prague 10). Brno has its Brno Municipal Court.

A perfect thing which helped us here it was "data box". Where would I be without it when dealing with the state administration? In order to get the information in time, I was prepared to tighten it digitally!

On 30.12.2023, I sent the same query to all 86 district courts, similar which I have sent to ministry two weeks ago. Again, full of anticipation, I prepared to evaluate the answers.

There is at least one in the Czech Republic such a trial? What will we do if the opinion of the Prague 10 District Court is confirmed that such a court does not exist in our country?

I spent my time searching the Internet, where I managed to find at least one case law, from which it could be ascertained that such a court actually exists.

After a long search, I managed to find the first one. It was the District Court of Uherské Hradiště and their traceable judgment of the Constitutional Court here . And it was painted! Exists by at least one such court, and the fact that such a specialization is not in Prague 10 at the senate "16 C" does not mean at all that such a specialization does not exist in the entire Czech Republic.

Meanwhile, my "data box" received the message. The clear matter that they wanted to have finally settled by the end of the year suddenly drags on with such an unpleasant obstruction!

I will not publish Mr. Judge's answer now because we had lost several times there. Just the fact that, according to the date, he had to write it full of impressions the day after receiving our objection, speaks volumes for its content. His answer could be wrapped in the following:

If you are so clever and object to my lack of jurisdiction, then tell the court immediately within the specified period, who do you think is materially competent? If you do not do so within the specified period, the court will have to decide in your disadvantage.”

So let's read a few sentences of the "Resolution" delivered to us, which the impressions described above fully confirm.

Here is the court's request for our addition:

---

---

And here is our addition:

---

---

So let's leave this legal battle in the "unfinished" state for now and let's return to interesting poll results - Which district court in Czech Republic has a specialization proceeding claims according to ATZ?. Internally, we called it “Don't you know? Ask!”

Individual answers that I received in the following two weeks from all district courts in the Czech Republic, I subsequently divided into the following categories for the purposes of these statistics:

1.   "We don't have it" category

In this most numerous category are the courts which, like the District Court of Prague 10, they answered clearly and without torture that they simply do not have such a specialisation. And that in most cases they "flicker" similarly to Prague 10 - the labor court.

It is interesting that such courts are located exclusively in district towns in Czech countries.

2.   "We won't tell you" category

In this numerous category of courts are those that answered my unequivocal question "do you have?" or "don't you?" in the words of the young investigator "Hlaváček" from well known Czech movie "Disbanded and Discharged" in phrase as 'Look scumbag look!'. And in order to (not) answer me, they sent me a link to the website of their court. Internally, I labeled them "idiots and illiterates".

It involved several courts across the entire Czech Republic.

3.  "We won't tell you until you tell us" category

In this, thank God, innumerable category of courts, there were those who responded to my unequivocal question "do you have?" or "don't you?" by asking me to complete my application with my date of birth. Although I did not originally follow up with my request to arrange a "tickling date" with some of them, I fulfilled their request within the time limit set by them and repentantly asked them once more with date of birth now. The fact that their answer ended up being categorised as 2 is a shame. Internally, I only labeled them "idiots", although I have to admit that they had a legitimate right to ask such request according to the Info Act.

It involved several courts across the entire Czech Republic.

4.  "We have", or "we have, but…” category

This unfortunately innumerable category of district courts made me the happiest!

It has been confirmed that if there is an ATZ law, then such a court really exists!

It is also an interesting finding that such courts are mainly located in district towns in Moravia and Silesia.

Conclusion of the survey:

In conclusion, we can generalise that the level of communication and the form of responses of "obligatory subjects" decreased in our glades and groves geometrically from east to west. It is therefore no secret that the worst condition was recorded in Prague and its surroundings.

Write to me, how do you explain that? I would really like to know your opinion.

So let me conclude with a list of the best courts:

· Uherské Hradiště District Court 

· Hodonín District Court 

· Opava District Court 

· Třebíč District Court 

· Nový Jičín District Court 

· Přerov District Court 

· Prostějov District Court 

· Rychnov nad Kněžnou District Court 

· Šumperk District Court

Congratulations to the winners and no honor to the losers!

Time has pockets full of surprises

I hesitated for a long time to include this post of mine with a quote by Jan Werich in the "Flashgun" category, and there were actually several reasons why I didn't put it here. Probably the most important of them was the fact that I got to this information purely by chance and relatively late, so marking it with a "flash news" icon would be somehow "out of line" and it would fit in summer time of the previous year. I also have to admit, completely without torture, that, thanks to my rich court battles with the local "team of the righteous", I didn't even want to believe it at all.

And where and how did I come to it?

I didn't come across it in the general media space of Radio ГA / ГA where I would have it, given its "crystal clear" reputation so I expected it a bit, but I stumbled upon it while purposefully searching the internet for my other stuff and checking one of your anonymous alerts. And the world was amazed – the article was published on the Internet in Czech and English.

In all silence, on 26/04/2023, i.e. after more than 4 years of legal battles, the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic decided in the dismissal of my former foreign colleague from Persian Service, that the Czech Labor Code protects foreign workers in the Czech Republic even in situations where the contract with the employee is concluded by mutual agreement according to the law of another state. It reacted to the complaint of Radio ГA / ГA against the verdict of the previous Supreme Court, thus rejecting their complaint and confirming it with its decision. This resolution can be read here .

It was mainly about the content of the termination of the employment relationship by the American employer and the determination of their reasons for termination, which must, according to Czech law, be more specific.

The representative of the complainant then stated in his complaint:

"There is no reason for the termination of the employment relationship of an employee performing work in ČR concluded between two foreigners , moreover, in the situation where both persons, the employee and the employer, are entities from the same country, it was assessed according to the law of the Czech Republic".

The Constitutional Court justified its decision as follows:

"Reducing the achieved level of protection of fundamental rights and freedoms cannot be allowed even in things with an international element".

On this occasion, I would like to recall the very transparent efforts of the judge of the Court of First Instance #JH ( "Dr. Hustá") about the reclassification of my claim against discrimination (according to the Anti-Discrimination Act - ATZ) to a matter "with an international element" (such as "Foreigner", which was described in several of my posts, last here ).

The reason for his "expulsion" at the time was the alleged disrespect of his superior and the sending of mass emails, which evaluated Radio ГA / ГA as a violation of company policies and internal regulations ("Internal policy").

Similar nonsense was also used in the case of another employee, when the reason for the dismissal was disobeying the order to wear a mask and using the word "bomb" in the premises of the building. where such a word he must not say.

Like the famous dialogue from the movie "Fotr je lotr":

Investigator	You said a bomb on a plane.
Greg Jebal	Well, what's so weird about it?
Investigator	It is not allowed to say bomb on a plane.
Greg Jebal	Boom-boom-boom, boom-boom, boom-boom-boom-boom

What do all these statements have in common?

I believe that it is primarily managerial impotence that must be embellished after receiving a judicial statement, which can be read between the lines in each of above said lawsuits. You can read about the fact that this is definitely not an exceptional phenomenon on the pages of the well-known website Atmoskop.cz.

---

---

Or here another post in English:

---

---

Let's review all the vicissitudes you had to go through.

Like me, this ex-colleague of mine also went through the proceedings of our well-known District Court for Prague 10. Like me, he also demanded in his lawsuit that his statement be declared invalid. As in my case, the defendant was Radio ГA / ГA, it was represented by attorney #MV ("Mgr. Piggy") and similarly to my case it was decided in his disadvantage. Unlike me, the court upheld his subsequent appeal at Municipal court of Prague and canceled the decision of the District Court for Prague 10 and upheld him.

Then it went relatively fast.

This was followed by a complaint by the lawyer #MV ("Mgr. Prasátko") to The Supreme Court and after failure here too, it was followed by a complaint to The Constitutional Court, which decided as it did.

All these cases finished with unwanted media publicity of Radio ГA / ГA in several articles on domestic and foreign websites in June 2023 (more here and here).

The publication of details in the collection of findings of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic was only the last point in his case, which started a few months before mine, and now gives me strength and hope to persevere and not give up.

God knows how my other 2 former foreign colleagues would turn out today, since they lost all their trials in Czech Republic in 2014 and under very similar circumstances. I know, it was during the upgrade of Radio ГA / ГA from version 1.0 to version 2.0 and according to the well-known saying – "as many lawyers, as many legal opinions".

If you want to read more about this Radio ГA / ГA case, click on my article "I will make you unemployed" here .

What to say in conclusion?

Perhaps just so much that I believe that one day I will be as successful in all my disputes with my former employer as he was. It just takes me not giving up and believing that time will also bring my surprise from one of its pockets.

Thanks to my former colleague, today I believe to this more than half a year ago.

Congratulations Arash!

Mičánky's lottery

Lottery is a legitimate way to meet your luck with the active contribution of external forces. As it is evident from its definition, its legitimate outcome and its reputation are always decided by those external forces. If this force is a supernaturally fatal force, everything is right. However, if that force is the influential end of the drawee's arm, there is trouble brewing.

Perhaps known as ve Carlovari lottery from April 2006, which came to the attention of 300 thousand internet followers by trying to pull two tickets from the lottery cup with "correct" company names , which is observed and the correctness of the act is supervised by a smiling notary. But there were others, with the result no less successful. Here, too, in this cup was looking for the right bubble envelope, a suitably bent corner of a piece of paper, or before the draw appropriately edited the lottery software.

But let's go to our "rubbing lottery tickets".

In the course of legal actions which I led against Radio ГA / ГA we encountered fateful manipulation in the allocation of lawsuits to the relevant court panel twice. Although both actions were sent to the court of local jurisdiction at different times and the "defendant" in both actions was identified exactly according to its name in the valid commercial register, i.e. American address plus her Czech address as an organizational folder, each time ended up in the fair hands of the "16 C" court panel.

In the court of local jurisdiction, and one can say globally in the Czech Republic (in contrast to "less democratic countries", such as Slovakia 😇), the judge (meaning the court panel) is assigned based on the work schedule. This is a publicly available document, which is sometimes "unfortunately" hidden on the official websites of the courts, in which all court panels are listed, their composition with the names of the judges, their identification mark (for example, "16 C") and their specialization (usually in percentages). 

While in other (those "less democratic") countries mentioned above, judges are assigned based on a generated allocation via special software, ensuring that a particular judge is not given a pre-selected case and thereby ensuring a kind of elementary justice based on mathematical coincidentally, this is still not the case here in most cases. So it can happen that even lawsuits that were delivered to the court at different times and related to a specific company are always dealt with by the same and previously known court panel. 

And how was it ensured that both lawsuits, even though they were each from different areas, ended up on the table and in the fair hands of the same judge, despite the "work schedule"?

The first action, related to the field of "labor law" and conducted as an action by an employee against Radio ГA / ГA for invalidity of dismissal, finished at that time according to the long-standing tradition and valid "work schedule, on the table of the court panel "16C". However, the second lawsuit against Radio ГA / ГA, this time according to the "anti-discrimination law", and which had no basis in the then valid work schedule", it was necessary somehow to steer in the right direction - again to the table of the court panel "16C ". But how to secure it when it is not possible to influence the lottery software?

Simply and visibly according to the established pattern. One would almost like to say that according to the tested template. Would a similarity like here?

And so they amended the second lawsuit so that they deleted the part, relating to the Czech address organizational folder, and left only the name with the address of its US headquarter in "Washington" and replaced the text "ATZ" (anti-discrimination law) with "discrimination".

The piece of paper was unobtrusively bent and deftly figuratively sealed in a bubble envelope. This is so that it will rustle correctly during the "lottery" when it will be allocated to the correct court panel "16C". 

For scumbags and squeamish people - everything is crystal clear, isn't it?! After all, this is a foreign judicial element (alias "Foreigner", as these files were additionally labeled against my will) and "discrimination" (aka "labour law") as the court bent it meaningfully. And Judge #JH (Dr. Hustá”) has both types of cases under her wing! The argument that I am suing the organizational component of the American company in the Czech Republic, and not its "top" in the USA, the judge is still silent and disinterested.

It will be interesting to see how the newly formed court panel "16 C", or the superior Municipal Court for Prague, will deal with our current objection of local non-jurisdiction it had to decide about that. Maybe today the vice-president of the circuit court regrets that in a weak moment she wrote to me on my complaint on 3 September 2021 the truth about how lawsuits are allocated here.

---

---

But let's go back to the recently published post Give him a muzzle in which I promised to write a little about how The "preliminary measure" against me in the circuit court probably burned, and I leave it purely to you whether you will adopt this method of filing lawsuits as your own. After all, it's one of things where what's not forbidden is allowed.

But first, some dry theory on the subject of Preliminary measures and how it should be carried out. Surely after reading this basic information you will understand that this is a very powerful tool on the part of the prosecutor and should be used like a saffron. Namely, with one "snap" you are accused and immediately "convicted" by a resolution. And really quickly – all in a few days.

So let's go briefly to the dry legal definition of this institute, with the "merits" of my case highlighted in red.

A preliminary measure may be imposed on another participant, to

• paid maintenance to the extent necessary

• provided at least part of the working salary, if it is the duration of the employment relationship and the petitioner does not work for serious reasons;

• deposited a sum of money or thing in custody at the court;

• did not deal with certain things or rights;

• performed, refrained from, or endured.

The proceeding is determined by a fundamentally competent (substantive and local) court, which will subsequently decide on the matter itself. They must decide on the proposal immediately, within 7 days at the latest. The proceedings of the court do not need to be ordered and the participants do not need to be heard. The court decides on a preliminary measure by resolution.

The only remedy against a preliminary injunction is  appeal. However, its submission is complicated by the fact that the resolution itself does not have to contain a justification. Given that evidence is not expected to be presented even in the proceedings itself, new evidence cannot be proposed even in the filed appeal.

By addressing the local "top" Radio ГA / ГA with an open letter on 8/3/2022, in which I alerted them to the oddities in the investigation and background of the security incident of 7/10/2019, the involvement of their "valuable" American colleagues on it, about strange financial transactions in IT of the same ones and about my intention not to keep it only to myself, I asked the evil one.

I probably gave it a crown by informing them of my intention to share these findings with their tribal puppeteers and swordsmen. And this probably got them excited.

In any case, since I did not shine during the mission described below to the attorney Radio ГA / ГA #MV ("Mgr. Prasátko"), I retern to my classic, situationally forced fabrication for legal certainty.

"Day met day, and so on Thursday 21.4.2022 v 15:10 ( just before closing time), a well known lawyer of Radio ГA / ГA #MV ("Mgr. Prasátko") delivered it to the office of the District Court for Prague 10 with a prepared muzzle lawsuit. He had clear instructions from his clear lady. He knew that #la ("Dr. Leklá Andělka ") is now under great pressure - litigation has been leading together for the second year. They don't win and they say that now he has come up with something so disgusting! It is said that he will demand a hearing from their superiors, whose names must not be pronounced even when the circular is on. Such insolence! But he, however, gives a thumbs-up to those two legal quick-wits, but especially to that "crappy Slovenian", he muttered indignantly into the lapel of his jacket.  

At window "number 5", boasting two payment terminals and a corpulent lady presiding over this area, he buys "cash” a two-thousand-crowns stamp, which he will keep at his mistress's place to redeem after completing the task, on the same day. The lady from the mailroom doesn't seem to notice the faint redness on the faded dimples. 

The young lawyers pamper themselves here! 

With the agreed signal, he draws attention to the fact that he has an appointment with Mrs. Judge #JH ("Dr. Hustá"), and that he will classically take the "overrun" under his righteous wings again. The person in knitting dress of the "samo-domo" brand looks at the work schedule and looking behind the bone frames with raised eyebrows says knowingly: "But Madam Judge is on vacation!"

With a tell-all wink at her, the lawyer, after adjusting his perfectly matched silk "sleek", hiccupped into the stew ala James Bond: "That's order. It will be her courtroom "16C". That was the agreement with lady judge.

Ahhhh," she replied significantly. And through the silence of the "Mičánky's Justice Factory" there was the faint echo of the receding soles of his "VagaBond" boots. Something like "Zero Seven", "Zero Seven", "Zero Seven..." 

After returning to the office, he did not forget to write down another "legal act", which together with bail 10 000 CZK will subsequently be reimbursed by the American taxpayer. Above all, don't forget to "register" that the task has been completed, he repeated to himself on the way to the Želivárnská "metro station". 

He didn't forget.

The subsequent brief call into the ear of his mistress that day ended with a tell-all sneer and the reassurance: "Don't worry, that " "I will take care of him". He could hear by the tone of her voice that she believed it too."

As can be seen from the registry stamp, the action was assigned to the well-known court panel "16 C" and was assigned the number "16 C 59/2022".

From now on, the lawsuit 16 C 59/2022 will be here with me, until this matter is decided fairly 😉

And to make it not so messy, this "preliminary" was assigned to #JH ("Dr. Hustá") deputy. The judge was on vacation, is it clear? But so what. After all, what's at home counts!

It was probably a relentless fight on their part, because almost a month passed from the filing of the lawsuit to the delivery of the resolution. If the law was fulfilled, which I don't want to doubt, then this time it took them at least 3 to convince the court panel "16 C" about how, on the recommendation of the legal team Radio ГA / ГA, to put on the notified muzzle weeks. 

And so, on 19/5/2022, my inbox rang "Resolution" in the matter "Imposition of the obligation to refrain from publishing confidential and sensitive information concerning the plaintiff". I wrote about this in part in my previous post "Give him a muzzle, so I will focus more on their justification for this measure. I already tasted a certain taste of this "eintopf" last time. And so that it's not just "one taste" again, our answer will follow in the form of an appeal, aka "what can we do with that". You will definitely not be bored…. 

We will contrinue sometime next time, if there is one.