Honorific in "American"

Honor (from the verb to honor, in this post from the phrase "affidavit", or "word of honor") is a quality of a being (that is, an entity that uses natural intelligence), most often a human, that can be characterized as moral credit, respectability, trustworthiness, or good name. Honor can be expressed as the potential to gain trust or show respect and as honor increases, this probability increases.

This is what public sources say about this phenomenon.

So let's move in time to the events of the summer of 2021, i.e. to the period after the unfavorable Brno mediation trip in June. Since we were at the beginning again, it was necessary to start preparing this time for a sharp legal battle between us and the legal duo Radio ГA / ГA, i.e. #LA ("Dr. Leklá Andělka") and #MV ("Mgr. Prasátko").

At the time, we had no idea that this team of the righteous had imperceptibly expanded to include an independent lady judge of the local circuit court, #JH ("Dr. Hustá").

I left my work equipped with curiosity, patience and with charged cell phones and notepad with several pencils we both set out on Mičánky.

Here we were greeted by a huge room with long tables, at the top of each an implacable corpulent lady sat with a large shopping basket from TESCO. After the necessary check of our documents and after apologising to us for our 30 minute delay (to understand from the beginning who is here for whom), we went to our free place at the table.

We were accompanied only by the rustling of files, the quiet talk of other colleagues watching the documents and the clicking of their cameras.

I was surprised that even though neither side had presented anything in court yet, the files for both of our lawsuits were getting pretty thick. I know, I also contributed with my several dozen pages of lawsuits, but the extent of both court files really surprised me. That's why I rushed to find out in detail what the other several dozen pages of Radio ГA / ГA have about me.

As we leafed through the files, we couldn't help but notice that in addition to the judge's many notes, mostly unfortunately in the documents of the opposing party, a handwritten telephone number of # MV ("Mgr. Prasátko") appeared here in the power of attorney supplied by him, or errors in the numbering of individual pages and attachments. These were mainly numerical duplications, or, on the contrary, gaps in their ranks. Later, this time for the third time, we shared our findings with the superior lady judge, Mrs. #RV ("Dr. Veverička").

It should be noted that to no avail, although it did have some success – increase in numbering of files, and even and summary overview started slowly closer to the ideal strong defined by the office rules.

Here is one of the previews where you can see (re)numbering in the file with the "affidavits in place" of Mr. #RC ("Remotely Controlled") and #JS ("Joints Smoker”), delivered to superior court in one of my many complaints.

---

---

For the sake of completeness and correctness, I am adding the answer of Mrs. Judge #RV ("Dr. Veverička") dated 17.10.2021, regarding the above-mentioned objection - in the familiar style now – everything is in order and in accordance with the law.

Do you remember her "truthful" statement to the text transcription of the audio recording in another matter here?

So I leave her response below uncommented. Something to think about would be – what those 30 pages probably contained and how they were added to the file? When and at what time and in what way were they inserted here?

---

---

All these findings and events led us to believe that with the impartiality of the independent judge #JH ("Dr. Hustá") it would not be completely "kosher". That's why we several times asked the superior lady judge to be excluded from both hearings due to bias.

Unfortunately to no avail.

And so, instead of a legal battle between the plaintiff and the defendant, we also dealt with legal battles with a related lady judge.

But about these findings and suspicions some time later.

Here is the response of the court management to another complaint dated September 3, 2021. Again, in the spirit of tradition, everything is perfectly fine. By having the opportunity to review the files several times and compare them over time, we could at least verify that each of our complaints led for additional additions to the file. Whether that really happened and whether I was really out of my depth to complain about something that has been on file all along, I respectfully leave to each of you to consider.

---

---

At the end of this response to the complaint, I present the part where the court management tries to explain the strangeness with the allocation of the discrimination suit to the hands of the same judge #JH ("Dr. Hustá ").

In this context, one true and funny saying comes to mind:

There is only one letter difference between all the doctors. Do you know of any example where a doctor wouldn't keep a doctor?

---

---

So it will be interesting to see how the lawsuit against discrimination in Radio ГA / ГA, according to the above opinion (Specialisation in anti-discrimination lawsuits is not established in this court.”), is handled by the local court. How will it probably decide on the lawsuit especially after its superior Prague Municipal Court of Appeal decided at its meeting on 31/08/2022 about its return and renegotiation right here, this time without the universal "independent judge"? More information is provided here.

Perhaps it would be worth considering to bring up some such judge at the local district court for Prague 10, given similar cases and the local affiliation of Radio ГA / ГA to the local court, don't you think?

In conclusion, let me say a few sentences about the "affidavit" of #RC ("Remotely Controlled") and #JS ("Joints Smoker"), allegedly written by one of them on 06/04/2020, i.e. at the time when he was no longer even an employee of the defendant, and the latter, probably a few days after my criminal complaint for a security incident committed in relation to my privacy and personal data.

According to all the judgments of the first-instance courts, led by Judge #JH ("Dr. Hustá") and on the basis of which I have lost all court cases with her so far, Mrs. "independent judge" emphasises their importance as pivotal in the description of events as they allegedly happened. In addition, the second statement is presented only in electronic form in an MS WORD file, and even without a signature.

The reasons for the rejection of lawsuits in the judgments of the courts of both levels have developed differently over time over the past two years.

In the beginning it was for the loss of trust. When the defendant was unable to elaborate, they came up with the version that I did not report something. When I proved to her that I should officially report it to myself since I was the only one responsible for the system, she came up with an "affidavit". She responded to my claim and evidence that my superior was informed about this incident and also to the interest of the police resulting from my criminal complaint against my superior. Looks like she finally accepted proof from the monitoring system that I actually recorded it there. Then the defendant came up with a theory, I note that together with the judge, that I should have turned off something and prevented the spread of the attacker, where she clearly did not understand the laws of the "cloud" infrastructure of the "SaaS" type. When I pointed out this fact and its technical impossibility of implementation, she came out during the next meeting with the version that I grossly violated my work duties. When I proved with my employment contract that I had held a job position for 5 years without defined job duties, i.e. essentially "spoken form only", she changed the reason for dismissal to definitive at the last appeal hearing version, namely that I grossly violated discipline.

And this is where the "affidavit" came in handy.

A similar method was used for the second lawsuit. It is said that my superior did not discriminate against me, he trained me regularly, gave me a salary, even some small reward, they made several entries from the attendance list for some kind of training outside the content of the lawsuit, where, in addition, some of the names are entered 3 times on the same day, and even some of the same ones at the same hour (probably those in question have reproduced). That among them there were trainings that related to something completely different, for example "harassment", after all, it also means that I was trained, right? Due to the fact that the documentation in the file was copied from the intranet, the trainings are presented here in their current form, while at the time of the lawsuit they existed on the intranet only in a "beta version", which I tried to prove with an extract from the email communication.

I believe that there is something different between the annual training about not slapping colleagues on the bottom, holding the door for them and not making any sexist remarks towards them, than the training on how to secure O365, or lessons on deploying applications in Microsoft Azure's cloud environment.

These are the trainings he refused to send me to, arguing that there was no money for it.

And now some dry legal sentences, relating to the phenomenon of the "affidavit, as I found them on the web.

---

New administrative order No. 500/2004 Coll. with effect from January 1, 2006, the institution of the sworn statement is almost completely abandoned, when § 53 paragraph 5 stipulates that the sworn statement can be used only as a substitute for documents (i.e. no longer as a substitute for other means of proof), but even then only in in the event that a special law so stipulates, under the conditions established by that special law.

With this amendment, sworn declarations as a substitute for documents are completely outside the regime of general administrative proceedings and, if they are not established by a special law for some special proceedings, they cannot claim. Special laws then usually allow sworn declarations to certify some characteristic of a person or traded item under a special regime, especially in cases where the country of origin of the participant in this special administrative procedure does not issue extracts from the criminal record or other documents about the criminal integrity of its citizens, but Czech law requires this integrity for the granting of some special authorisations requires; there are only rare cases of affidavits admitted by special law.

According to 2021 statistics, it is reported that almost 25% of people lied on their affidavits about their COVID-19 test results.

It offends me as a person, if someone like my former superior decided with his "honorary statement" that I was fired from my job according to the law, or that I was not discriminated against by him. And I'm not even talking about that it was not an administrative proceeding.

So let's finally look at the affidavit of my former supervisor #RC ("Remotely Controlled").

Certainly each of us, although it is sad, at least once in our life, lied. Whether it was in childhood in relation to your parents, friends or unfortunately also later on to your partners. Since I don't consider myself a holy man, I know what I'm talking about.

The basis of successful lying must be a credible story, at least some minimal evidence, and above all there must be in some time frame.

I will keep quiet about the story "on the water" and the evidence in this particular "affidavit" so as not to violate the GDPR, but the time frame in those three versions of the statement I will focus on "fest".

So let's go to those versions:

• Version 1 – the original English version, certified by a "Vinohrady notary" dated June 4, 2020 and according to the paper written as the writer probably intended to write it. The document contains 4 pages, with the first 2 pages appearing to be copied verbatim from my termination letter. The last fourth page is exclusively dedicated to his "development" in the "cyberstalking" I exposed and my criminal complaint against him. Why is the third page, which is visibly inserted here and moved horizontally by about 3 cm higher, remains unanswered, because the court refused to summon a witness and thus rejected evidence in this matter.

---

---

So here #RC ("Remotely Controlled") actually admits that it has been on my computer for more than a year for various reasons.

• Version 2 – Czech translation, provided by Radio ГA / ГA to both files for my lawsuits for Judge #JH ("Dr. Hustá"), where the original date is still kept.

---

---

• Version 3 – modified Czech translated version, really modified by Radio ГA / ГA for Police of the Czech Republic for purpose of the investigation of my criminal complaint on #RC (“Remotely Controlled”) for “Suspect of committing criminal issue listed in Act No. 40/2009 Coll. - Criminal law against the rights to the protection of personality and paper secrecy"

---

---

Our well-known trio of the righteous probably did not count on the fact that we would order to look at the files in police criminal department.

It will also certainly be interesting to see how the professional association of "Advocate Chamber" will react to this manipulation of evidence, where the external advocate of Radio ГA / ГA #MV ("Mrg. Prasátko") is a member and who is paid by American taxpayer.

The stakes were visibly higher for the police, and above all, there was no independent judge who could sweep this evidence off the table.

In the end, this fit nicely into the original statement of the legal department of Radio ГA / ГA, which downplayed this whole criminal misconduct of #RC ("Remotely Controlled") and finally in the end, his act was even highlighted.

It's all about perspective.

---

---

In general, in both my cases and in the "honest statements" of the key figures involved in them, there were always big problems with the dates.

So, let's conclude with the preamble of the affidavit #RC ("Remotely Controlled"), written suddenly on 6/4/2020, apparently after I asked the District Police Department about the status of the investigation of my criminal report.

---

---

And since my post today lacked a bit of that fable, let me fix that in its conclusion.

And so #RC ("Remotely Controlled"), gifted with boundless loyalty to Radio ГA / ГA, in a touching attempt to save this long-time breadwinner and protector, despite the fact that he no longer works for them, in a sudden movement of the mind, seasoned with an irresistible urge to open the eyes of justice for good, in the middle of the feverish packing of his family and household before a long journey behind the puddle, he writes "in American" those 4 pages of the "duster's" sworn statement.

Subsequently, driven by an unrelenting desire to do justice, he visits a notary in Vinohrady, where he honestly signs all his truths. With the feeling of a savior, i.e. mainly his own, he hands over everything according to the "remotely controlled" instructions immediately to the legal department of Radio ГA / ГA.

That there would be some damn money in it???

Then just have it quickly translated and put in the file. But "they" will take care of that when he is safe and in his native lump.

As one of the investigators revealed privately – “do you know of any case where someone like that would be extradited back (from US) here to testify?”

Simple and genius, right? Two birds with one stone! And do you see? Not even two affidavits were needed!

The dice have been cast! And because the ubiquitous COVID was attacking, he did not forget to wash his hands thoroughly after returning home at the end of his righteous mission.

That it wasn't like that?

Honorable "American" word that it was!

---

The rest again sometime next time, if there are any...

Reputation worth 1000 US bucks

Reputation or good reputation is something that expresses the degree to which a certain subject is in accordance with objectively recognized positive qualities, such as honor, credibility or reliability. This term can include generally intangible and separately incalculable values, which in the case of a legal entity can be manifested in its professionalism, whether it enjoys the favor of the public and whether the quality of the services it provides corresponds to the declared claims.

Reputation is always assessed as a whole and does not refer to individual properties. A good name is built by actions that are consistent with all objectively recognised positive characteristics, and is weakened by actions that do not fulfill such characteristics. It goes without saying that this is a lengthy and often exhausting process.

Reputation is hard and long to build, but easily and quickly lost. Building a good name is often accompanied by the efforts of many people, while its loss is often the result of the activities of only a handful of them.

So let's see how the Radio ГА / ГA company understands the good reputation and how significant price for it really has so-called company goodwill.

It is 2020, or rather its COVID March, and I have the last few days at work ahead of me. Under strange circumstances and without a deeper explanation of the reasons, after 15 years of trouble-free work, I was fired by a team of super-humans, and according to the rules of the well-known children's game, my countdown began. Palms to eyes and one big wish for them - may the evil master be gone as soon as possible and we can continue in our all-embracing goodness!

Here, too, something previously unheard of happened. In addition to the lawsuit for the invalidity of the notice, which Radio ГA / ГA was already used to in the past and appropriately professionally and personally prepared, a lawsuit against discrimination and unequal treatment was also delivered. So how do you deal with such a dilemma?

It started, as it used to be at Radio ГA / ГA, on a good note - aren't you serious? Do you want to waste time and money with another lawsuit? Aren't you sorry? One lawsuit to invalidate the notice is enough, isn't it? Anyway, the second one is about the same thing, and remember that there is a judge in the court who is not curious about any of your discrimination claims and will "properly sweep" you, they tried to collegially agree with us. Actually why not? We still wore the same company T-shirt.

It didn't help. The subspecies simply couldn't get their more experienced colleagues to agree, so an independent lady judge had to help. The lawsuit was amended so that the address of the defendant, i.e. the company Radio ГA / ГA, unlike the first lawsuit for the invalidity of the notice, was not an organizational unit in Prague, but a company from Washington, USA. Now, thanks to the judicial qualification "FOREIGN", both lawsuits could be definitively "merged" and independent trials could begin.

Both lawsuits by the same court panel, which has been successfully tested for years - how brilliant. Just an ideal brand!

Clear wine was poured, but something still floated in it. It was tried again after a good time, this time in June 2020 at the circuit court at an informative meeting - of course without an audio recording, with an additional protocol on request and "about nothing". All this with only us, the troublemakers, still not understanding her goodness.

Well, as you wish, the judge said to herself after the meeting. The rest of the righteous team from the opposing side said to themselves afterwards that there is no help for those who are not advised. And so January 2021 came with the clanking of weapons, the deception of the body, and finally the fight at close quarters. In this tug-of-war, always pulling on a shorter and shorter rope, but fighting without fear or shame.

Whoever digs in the dirt always gets himself dirty and pollutes the surroundings with this dirt.

When looking at the files and from information from public sources, very strange contours of something that was hidden from us at the beginning of both trials and should have been so until their ends began to emerge. With the findings, we turn to the #MS ("Justice"), the superior court at the hands of #RV ("Dr. Veverička"), the "ombudsman", the management of Radio ГA / ГA represented by #KF ("Kristína Fšetko"), including to its founder #USAGM ("US Global Media"). The only reaction of those affected institutions is - "we strongly reject anything and everything", neatly wrapped in the usual phrases about their high moral values, and after presenting suspicions with evidence only their silence, obfuscation or (in)timidation. On the contrary, from those not involved in those processes, and therefore not immersed in them, we only encounter trivialisation of our findings and justification of the first ones.

Don't worry, we'll cover each of them in a future post.

But now you may be wondering why I am writing so long and general about it and only "Cimmerman-like" hints instead of facts?

Please hold on a little longer, the reputation and the money will be there at the end.

On 31.8.2022, i.e. after more than 2 and a half years of trial and tribulation, we walked humbly to the Municipal Court in Prague for a court hearing regarding our appeal against the #JH judgment ("Dr. Hustá”) in the matter of discrimination and unequal treatment, codenamed “Waterloo” internally to us. Trained by experience with the opposite party from previous negotiations, when the lawyer Radio ГA / ГA #MV ("Mgr. Prasátko") once again and traditionally, 24 hours before the court hearing, sent us an answer to our appeal after more than 6 months "aka" an appointed mediator, we expected a classic course. The process will be the same as last time with resume - that everything happened according to the law, that everything during the trial of the judge of the first instance was crystal clear, and that, on the contrary, we are the ones who still do not want to understand the justice.

So pay the costs to the other party and "bye bye".

We were expecting another record for the shortness of the court's decision and we were secretly placing bets - last time it was 15 minutes, now it will be 10, right? And how will we be financially at the end? Again, minus another 6,000 "crowns" for the lawyer for his 2 actions - one for writing an answer at the last minute, for which it is impossible to prepare in terms of time, and the other for showing up and approaching? As always with a smile and like dancing - understand just like that and lightly, while cheerfully chirping with #LA ("Leklá Andělka")? That I couldn't choose a better job, it occurred to me then, as many times before.

After 15 minutes of deliberations, when both my sister and I stated that neither of us won the bet this time, we suddenly realize that the deliberations of this court panel are in a completely different league. We are surprised to find that our comments and statements are finally being read, their validity is evaluated and compared with the law. How incredible after so long! A professional approach to the conduct of the meeting and preparation for it with a lot of notes directly in the text of our appeal and on paper outside of it. Another world! In the recess before the final judgment was handed down, I remarked dryly - if I were to lose all these trials, then with a judgment signed by this lady judge! The sister was happy to prove me right.

So what was put on the imaginary scales and what did I want to get to know in this legal odyssey?

Don't expect any millions - just the very ordinary apology, the text and justification of which I present below.

---

The Defendant is obliged to apologise to the Plaintiff in writing and publish this apology together with an attachment of a copy of the judgment in the form of an e-mail sent by internal e-mail to the e-mail group "ALL STAFF", containing the addresses of all the Defendant's employees, in bilingual version (Czech and English) with the text: "We hereby apologise to Mr. the treatment that the employer committed towards him by not allowing him for a long time to supplement his qualifications and increase the expertise necessary for the proper performance of his work, that he did not comply with internal principles and regulations, the Company's Code of Ethics, the Collective Agreement and the laws of the Czech Republic, especially the Labor Code." when the sender of this electronic mail message is the statutory body of the Defendant, the copy will contain the private email address of Plaintiff, within five days of the entry into force of the judgment, with the day of dispatch being a standard working day and the time of dispatch being between 9: 00 and 17:00 CET and the defendant is obliged to reimburse the Claimant for the costs of the proceedings within three days of the judgment becoming final.

---

In addition, it was written in the justification:

1. The actions of the Defendant in the period from spring 2012, until the moment of filing the lawsuit, i.e. until 19.3.2020, consisting in not allowing the Defendant, due to his age, to complete the qualifications and expertise necessary for the proper performance of the work and the actions of the management employees of the Defendant towards the Plaintiff, consisting in non-compliance by the Defendant with the published internal principles and regulations, the company's Code of Ethics and the Collective Agreement and the laws of the Czech Republic, is discriminatory and unequal treatment.

2. The Defendant is obliged immediately from the acquisition of legal force of this judgment to desist from unequal treatment and discrimination against the Plaintiff in the form of applying and complying with the internal principles and regulations published by the Defendant, the Company's Code of Ethics and the Collective Agreement and laws of the Czech Republic.

3. The Defendant is obliged to eliminate the consequences of discrimination and unequal treatment in the form of a personnel audit for the period 2012-2020, focused on compliance with internal principles and regulations published by the Defendant, the Company's Code of Ethics and the Collective Agreement and laws of the Czech Republic by the Defendant's management, to prepare a binding methodology to prevent discrimination and unequal treatment, especially towards Czech employees, within 60 days of the acquisition of legal force of this judgment and to extend its regular annual internal training of the Defendant's employees, primarily related to "harassment", also to the area of compliance with the laws of the Czech Republic in relation to the field of work, civil and criminal law.

Did I want that much from Radio ГA / ГA?

Wouldn't it be possible to sit down together out of court and resolve it as adult, university-educated people and once and for all in the spirit of the familiar "what are we - what are we"?

We tried it a total of 4 times. Every time, instead of an answer, just another tightening of the screws according to the familiar - employees, let alone former ones, are simply not negotiated at Radio ГA / ГA!

Let this be a small taste of how the independent judge #JH ("Dr. Hustá") judged this matter independently at the court of first instance on November 2, 2021, and which we publish here outside the topic of this post. This text transcription was created from a recording that came to us shortly after the meeting from an unknown sympathizer, and we present it here now as a small taste of the events of the stormy autumn of 2021.

In order to better understand the context of events, I would like to quote the statement of #KF ("Kristína Fšetko") regarding my disagreement with the employer's behavior towards me:

“All steps and measures taken against you since December 2019 have been taken in accordance with all applicable laws and other legal regulations of the Czech Republic. We have always acted professionally and with full respect for applicable laws, the internal regulations of the Employer and our high moral standards."

And then adds:

We therefore reject as unfounded any of your claims regarding the alleged discrimination against you.

So I take the liberty of transcribing the recording between the individual hearings, in which the independent lady judge teaches her colleague from her court panel what discrimination actually is. Even though it was a break after the hearing of the previous court hearing on the invalidity of the statement, she managed to write for it in 12 minutes and at the same time decide on the rejection of the action for discrimination, which was only to follow after that.

Everything in the spirit of efficiency, economy and of course – impartiality.

Sitters	She said that to herself a little forcefully, she should have told herself that the meeting is over. No one reacted to it and everyone sat like a stone.
Judge	Hey, but I'm really trying. I try to look at her. Unfortunately, I won't be working out today and I need it like salt, and I won't make it at four. So I'll go to the theater in the evening.
Sitters	What are you going for?
Judge	With a friend. I don't know (laughs). I simply told her that I would go to anything today. I have now decided that I will not accept any evidence of discrimination (with a sneer). Which is the easiest for me, we would be there further, still. Hey, that over there, that would still be what's somewhere on the Internet,...
Male voice	Look, were they instructed at that first meeting?
Judge	Well, they were, in my opinion…
Male voice	But there was only one, so I'm not too sure.
Judge	Hey, come here (points to something, man just goes "um"). And she focused on it after the first one. What did she focus on the mediation, ... She still had nothing here (hmmm). Here she keeps saying that I established, I don't know who.. So I started writing it and then I understood that it was useless... (types into the computer) Look, I don't know if you noticed, but she admitted for a while that he did it (man hmmm), but she started stuffing other stuff in there, …
Male voice	But that he is not to blame...
Judge	That he wasn't to blame, that goes without saying, and she tried too, that he did other things well and so on, sure... But why...?
Sitters	But she kept doing the "funny", and also if there were 15 or 20...
Judge	Well of course! Look, according to me, he should have taken the agreement and three salaries and goodbye.
Sitters	Or even the 5 were admitted.
Judge	Look, they didn't admit. Well, yes, because it was 3 before and I, when he still wanted the 10, so I tried to see if we could make it to the 5.
Sitters	Look, and why did she turn it on you, that you don't have a mandate?
Judge	Hey guys, listen to her, it's actually very difficult with her. What? Well, just... As you have it there, exactly. (checks write-up). Look, look how much time and how many people spend here because of her, ... Didn't I let you read that? The president, vice-president, unions, ministries, they have to discuss her complaint, ... I have it here, then I'll lend it to you (the man laughed... and they check the minutes and talk about it together and laugh...)
Sitters	Let's just agree on when I'll sign it? (...long typing on the computer...) (Everyone reads the complaint and shouts in derision)
Judge	That really made me laugh... (...and shows something)
Both	It's your opinion, but really good, good! So let's leave it at that, shall we? This has never happened to me in the entire time I've been working here...
Judge	I'm also thinking about what else I'll experience here... (they type for a long time on the computer) Here is one procedure that my good friend sent me, it is a constitutional finding. If a person who felt discriminated against when purchasing services, this person must not only claim, but also prove in court proceedings, that he was not treated in the usual way, i.e. in a non-disadvantaging way. If he does not prove this claim, he cannot succeed in the proceedings. Furthermore, they must claim that the disadvantageous treatment was motivated by discrimination on the basis of something. I have a job here... However, this motivation is not needed in the case of ... (reads something quickly and mumbles). Well, it doesn't matter. It's just that he has to ... If the person proves that they feel harmed .... And I'll just try to give it…
Sitters	What can be taken as proof of discriminatory behavior?
Judge	Hey, I don't know. I'll get lunches, black people won't get lunches. So I gave vouchers to everyone every year, Nováková simply doesn't get it. Or I'll invite everyone else to the party and I won't invite (some name)
Sitters	We had a case of discrimination here when someone claimed to have thrown a banana peel on his table.
Judge	Yeah, we had that here, and he lost it too! (laughing mockingly)
Sitters	Yeah, but you didn't accept it as evidence... What would happen next with the banana peel?
Judge	That's what we heard, and of course he'll deny it. That's complicated for you. Someone even wrote a song about it... About "sexual harassment", (and entertains others by explaining what is and what is not harassment)
Sitters	(cites the case of psychiatrist Cimický, who was accused of harassment...
Judge	Wait, I don't know that at all. (Associate describes the medialized case of the last few days)
Judge	Well sure, it's exactly the same as with Kolínský. Suddenly you're bothering everyone who comes under your nose...
Sitters	One dares and the others join. For bravery and courage...
	…………
Male voice	So if they have a problem with that, then if they want to leave, let them go...
President	Exactly, so let them go... It doesn't matter.
Male voice	You declare it and it's settled. I wouldn't mess with them at all.
	…………
Judge	So I don't have to teach her about tolectom...? (several people speak)
President	Well, yes, I teach them, but this is...
Judge	(trying to explain something to her) ...when she's there she has an awful lot...
President	Then you reject them all, well! Like what...? Those suggestions. I declare it briefly, as if the motions presented orally by the representative of the plaintiff ...... are rejected. Period!
Judge	No, no, no, in my opinion, I reject it as a factual statement, she was concentrating, she didn't add it there, so I don't think I need to lecture her? I canceled all the evidence...
President	Well, I think that according to Article 119, as it were, it is necessary...
Judge	Because we will never end here!
President	Well, don't lecture her, come on! So just don't lecture her. Yeah?
Judge	Okay.
President	(leaves the room…)

The court, instead of evaluating the evidence that was proposed and that was presented to the court, preferred to consult “with its good friend” as is evident “from the audio recording of 2.11 .2021 above. When pronouncing the verdict, she was guided by the opinions and opinions of local IT specialists, as she herself stated in her closing speech.

And so, just like in the 50s, other well-known (#RV ("Dr. Veverička") and unknown participants (such as unknown a male voice repeatedly scolding and asking for my harshest punishment).

Just as in the past, petitions of street organizations of the Communist Party of the Czech Republic are figuratively organized, workers in factories meet over petitions with requests for the harshest punishments, and all this just because I allowed myself to dislike their behavior, and even for help your setter in the role of legal representative, to defend! So unheard of and worthy of true contempt! Yuck!

Until today, we have not found out who is that "male voice" on the recordings, so exemplary fighting against us for Radio ГA / ГA.

I am particularly saddened by the way the president of the circuit court leads her subordinate to make procedural errors in order to decide the judgment according to the wishes of the defendant.

The most piquant part of this whole story is the answer of the president of the court, who emphatically denied her presence at the preparation of my judgment on the grounds that it would be contrary to the rules of the OSŘ (Civil Court Code). The judge continued in the same vein, i.e. her subordinate, who refused to confirm her superior's presence here as well. May it be to her advantage that, unlike her, she did not flaunt OSŘ directly, but "only" lied.

We believe that this could also help to some extent in the decision of the appeal court in the appeal hearing described here.

And now "here (figuratively) about that Little Red Riding Hood".

After 40 minutes of discussion, a decision was made.

The verdict of the first-instance court panel, led by #JH ("Dr. Hustá") and the entire court case surrounding my claim against discrimination and unequal treatment in Radio ГA / ГA was canceled by the decision of the superior appeals court and returned to its beginning. Such is our little "déjà vu", in which the main role of judge will, according to the decision of this court, be played by someone completely different.

We already know what it feels like when a convicted person waits in the courtroom for the jury's expected verdict. As if in some "American B-movie", our knees buckled from the news and we both burst into tears in our embrace. After the words "there is no appeal against this judgment", I caught a quick dash of the righteous duo #LA ("Dr. Leklá Andělka") and #MV ("Mgr. Prasátko") out of the corner of my eye.

Holt, I guess we weren't the only ones surprised by his result.

It was written on 19/03/2020 and I, as an employee of Radio ГA / ГA, am once again submitting a more than 30-page lawsuit against my employer against discrimination and unequal treatment to the court of first instance, and I humbly believe in the impartiality of the courts. Today, in the position of his former employee, I am successfully suing him on this matter already for the third year.

Isn't it absurd that such a famous company, "bragging" about owning a patent on respecting human rights in the territory of "I can't see to I can't see", doesn't find it shameful? Or is it just about the huge ego of the self-proclaimed saviors of her good name in this effort of theirs to make themselves visible for good?

It still makes sense to me not to give up and to point out that discrimination and unequal treatment in Radio ГA / ГA is a phenomenon that must be fought mainly internally. If this problem is solved in front of his main entrance on Vinohradská street, his reputation or good reputation suffers.

I expected that a good reputation of the Radio ГA / ГA company is valued in more than the 1000 US bucks which I had to pay so far.

I know, the time is bad. So pay the fat man and pay in cash.

Viewing on viewing

Originally I wanted to publish a new article, describing another in the chronological sequence of stories in our struggle with windmills, greatly inflated by our famous trio of righteous, ideologically supported "high ethical and moral values" of Radio ГA / ГA and well-oiled money of American taxpayers #UTP ("US tax payers") through funds and grants #USAGM ("US Global Media"). But after a few sentences of feverish writing I realised that, like me once, you too might be unpopular in this area, and you might not even know about the existence of the possibility of viewing files, as a basic prerequisite of the right to a fair trial. And at the same time, this is one of the institutes guaranteed to us by the "Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms" and to which I will actively refer in future posts.

There are many links on the Internet in paragraph form, devoted in detail to the rights and obligations when viewing files. I happened to find here a rather nicely and comprehensively described example this one. Although these are details of administrative proceedings, there is no significant difference in the parts relating to court proceedings (see here). Therefore, I prefer to focus only on the technical side of the matter and on the practical experiences we have experienced from the point of view of our "locality".

Ugh, I'm starting to use the terminology of a tribe I never wanted to hear about.

So let's get down to the nitty-gritty of the peeping.

To begin with, it is necessary to contact by email via the address podatelna@osoud.pha10.justice.cz the lady at the filing office and ask her to allow viewing of the files according to the number assigned to you.

At first, in my senior indiscretion, I thought that if I gave the lady a date and time that I wanted to attend the viewing, everything is done from my side and our court system would take care of the rest. In response, I learned almost immediately how terribly wrong I was. Not me, but the lady at the court is the one who will determine when you have to appear for inspection and that it will not be in less than 2 working days, you will be instructed soon. So you have no choice but to accept this rule and scold yourself according to the familiar "who the hell is here for whom?".

According to the date of your "admission", approved by the lady at the filing office, you will ask your superior for time off, or simply run away from work. In this context, it is important to realize that this is not an operation for one or two cigarettes, but an activity that you can spend several hours on. In any case, it depends on the thickness of the file, which in our case was several hundred pages for each claim.

So if you have an approved date and the work leave, you can go to the court to inspect the files. Knowing the already mentioned "who is here for whom", I recommend that you keep the date agreed upon by the lady from the office. Otherwise, it may happen that you will be blamed for coming at 9:30 instead of 9:00. An answer in the style of "so what?", or "according to what law do I have to be here at 9:00 a.m.?" will usually disarm her so much that she will stop showing favor to you for your bad luck and you will be able to get down to work immediately.

For the success of this event, to which you have decided to devote your precious time, it is good to carefully equip yourself technically. A high-quality camera in your mobile phone and suitable software for quickly taking "handheld" photos should be the basis. There is no point in talking about sufficient data storage capacity in your mobile phone or "cloud".

Before you start taking pictures, it is important to check that the file is correctly marked with a file mark and that it has a properly maintained inventory, which is a kind of table with information about the documents and the dates they were entered into the file. In the file you should find all pleadings, protocols, records, written decisions, exhibits, written responses of the opposing party, all together with all attachments. You will also find the judge's notes here, which can tell a lot about where her mind is going. In other words, if there are more notes in the part of the file belonging to the opposing party, it is irrefutable evidence that you are pulling the short end of the rope, and the next event will probably catapult you into the role of an extra.

It is especially appropriate to focus on the sequence in the numbering of the files' pages. Otherwise, you will end up in a situation, similar to ours, where pages will be renumbered differently, numbers will be crossed out, and gaps in the numerical sequence logically lead to the suspicion that "something" will be added here later. In our case, we found out from the photos taken from several viewing dates that our file literally "lived" with its content!

After taking the photos, you sign a protocol with the "supervisor" so that it is clear to all parties who and when was familiar with the contents of the file. It is a good idea to go over the photographed documents in peace somewhere outside the court and, in case of confusion, repeat the whole operation "for extraordinary success" several more times.

The chapter itself is an operation to take over the audio recording of the court proceedings.

That is, if you are lucky enough to have a recording device in the room, which was not the case in our case at least once. As mentioned earlier in one of the earlier articles - namely, in case of ambiguities between the written record (or protocol) and the audio recording, the audio one always takes precedence. Those hours spent listening to meetings and transcribing them! This requires really strong nerves and boundless stamina.

However, before you go to court to take over the audio or video medium (or CD or DVD), you proceed in the same way as when requesting access to the file. Again, only after confirming the date, go to the court, this time however go to its information department. As has already been mentioned here several times - don't forget the rule "who is here for whom", and therefore if you are taught to greet politely at home, the lady clerk will probably give you a narrow window in bulletproof glass, protecting her from bullets, germs and everything possible and impossible (that is, mainly in front of you) and she probably won't respond to your greeting. Don't despair. Instead, boldly explain your request to her.

And now comes the most important thing to know, which could easily ruin your plan to take over the carrier. Especially think about this if you decided to stop for it during your lunch break, before work, or just by car in the blue zone in Míčánky and "for a blinker".

It is that unfortunate 50 CZK stamp provided by the court as a "no name" audio or video carrier, and if you do not have the stamp after your request, you will be in huge trouble. However, there is another option - providing any other empty CD carrier.

Forget the idea of asking for "cash" in advance, and even if you add something on top, you won't walk away with this bribe from the incorruptible lady. And that's right! You're in court, aren't you?

Perhaps you have now come up with such a silly idea that in the 21st century there are other options for paying for services for burning content to a data carrier, such as cashless payment by card or another similar method. Unfortunately, this evolution hasn't arrived here yet, so you'll be left to run around the court looking for some "pinball". This ignorance will especially not pay off if you don't have the appropriate cash in the local currency. I know what I am talking about. This happened to my sister, a Slovak currency citizen, who, apart from the "ójro", didn't even have the famous crone here at the time.

I thought it was just the incapacity of the circuit court in question. I fared no better on a similar request in the Municipal Court at the Court of Appeal. Here, I was at least instructed by the local "supervisor" that this is a valuable item, and therefore I can't pay it by card. She didn't reply to my argument that it was strange to me, as I had recently paid the same stamp at the post office with a card, probably thanks to the gasp from my quick reaction.

And so every time I stood at these glass windows and I asked and asked and asked for something like this in these courts, I remembered this story of ours.

My silent witnesses were always those two cashless payment terminals in front of each of them. So pointless. Probably like their attendants from the other side of the glass.